Real news. Real stories. Real voices.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Supported by

Explaining Ballot Questions 2 and 4: Changing language in the Nevada Constitution

FILE - People wait to vote in-person at Reed High School in Sparks, Nev., prior to polls closing on Nov. 3, 2020.
Scott Sonner
/
AP
FILE - People wait to vote in-person at Reed High School in Sparks, Nev., prior to polls closing on Nov. 3, 2020.

Most people know at least one of the ballot questions voters will decide this fall, because it’s been something of a dividing line between Republicans and Democrats. It asks voters if they want to solidify abortion rights in the state Constitution.

But two lesser-known questions deal with archaic language, and offensive language, that remains in our state constitution.

The first one, Question 2, defines institutions that the state supports. This is what it says: “Institutions for the benefit of the insane, blind, deaf and dumb … shall be fostered and supported by the state.”

And Question 4 would remove slavery as punishment for crime from the Constitution. If passed this November, both become law.


Guests: David Orentlicher, law professor, UNLV and assemblyman, District 20; Chris Peterson, legal director, American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada

Stay Connected
Christopher Alvarez is a Mexican American who graduated from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas with a Bachelor's in Journalism and a focus on audio podcasting. He previously worked as a multimedia content producer and reporter at Nevada Public Radio, focusing on the State of Nevada and Desert Air programs.
How is Las Vegas' healthcare system really doing, and what does it mean for you and your family? Desert Companion's Health Issue takes a deep dive into these questions and explores how heart-centered business leaders prove that doing good benefits the bottom line.