Mike Brown has been using the Hubble Space Telescope pretty consistently for most of the past three decades, since it launched in 1990. But recently he had an experience with Hubble that he never had before.
Brown, an astronomer at Caltech, got permission to use Hubble to do a detailed study of Jupiter's four largest moons. These moons are called the Galilean moons, since Galileo Galilei spotted them in 1610.
They include: Ganymede, which is bigger than the planet Mercury and has a mysterious magnetic field; Io, which is the most volcanically active place in the solar system; Europa, which has more liquid water than Earth; and Callisto, which is kind of a simple ol' cratered moon.
After Hubble was supposed to have checked out Ganymede, the data got beamed down, processed, and sent to Brown by email. He eagerly opened it up. There was nothing there.
He immediately thought to himself, "What did I screw up this time?" which is, as he puts it, "pretty much what you always do as a scientist, when you see something that didn't work."
He checked and rechecked the instructions he sent to Hubble. They were fine.
Nonetheless, it turns out that Hubble had been pointing at the wrong patch of sky. Brown says this kind of error quickly happened two more times as he tried to survey Jupiter's moons.
"I don't know if three times in a week is unusual or not, but it seems pretty unusual to me," says Brown.
Tom Brown, head of the Hubble mission office at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore—and no relation to Mike Brown--says that Hubble does indeed just sometimes aim in the wrong direction.
"It used to happen on the order of about one percent of the time," he says. "These days, it happens more like five percent of the time."
This is an aging telescope, after all. Back in 2018, when a gyroscope on Hubble failed, researchers activated one of its on-board spares—the so-called gyroscope 3. It's been glitchy from the get-go.
"It tells you the telescope is moving around even when it's not," explains Brown.
Telescope operators compensate for this error, but sometimes it gets out of whack before they're able to adjust things.
A disappointed researcher can submit a request to have a do-over, and they'll generally get their data eventually--assuming they weren't trying to see some once-in-a-million years brief cosmic event.
No one really knows why gyroscope 3 is such a pain, says Brown, and conceivably, it could get so bad that they might have to turn that one off.
"The biggest downside then is, instead of having the entire sky available at any one time, we would have half the sky available at any one time," he says.
Still, Hubble would remain enormously popular. Hundreds of teams get to use the telescope every year. They are the lucky ones, because there is so much demand that the majority of proposed observations have to be rejected.
Hubble is currently being used for fields that didn't even exist when it was launched, like studying planets that orbit distant stars.
"Hubble really is a very unique resource for humanity. And once it's gone---I mean, a lot of people are already dreading that day--but I think when it's gone, it's going to hit people...hard," says Brown.
Engineers currently estimate that Hubble could keep going for at least another five years, and probably longer.
NASA has another big space telescope called the James Webb in the works, but it's not exactly like Hubble has experienced multiple delays and huge cost over-runs. It won't launch before late next year.
You won’t find a paywall here. Come as often as you like — we’re not counting. You’ve found a like-minded tribe that cherishes what a free press stands for. If you can spend another couple of minutes making a pledge of as little as $5, you’ll feel like a superhero defending democracy for less than the cost of a month of Netflix.