NPR
National

Government Watchdog Says Homeland Security Leaders Were Not Legitimately Appointed

902578476_1986468244.jpg

Acting U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf testifies during a hearing before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on August 6.
Alex Wong, Getty Images

Acting U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf testifies during a hearing before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on August 6.

Updated at 4:47 p.m. ET

The Government Accountability Office says that the acting leaders of the Department of Homeland Security, who have been serving in their roles without Senate confirmation, were not appointed through a valid process.

Since November, Chad Wolf has been serving as acting secretary of DHS and Ken Cuccinelli as senior official performing the duties of deputy secretary.

Neither of those appointments is legitimate, the GAO found, because they depended on the actions of a prior official who himself was improperly placed in charge of the department due to an error in paperwork.

The opinion could prompt judges to dismiss some Homeland Security actions as illegal, and it also suggests it is not currently clear who has the legal authority to run DHS.

"We are referring the question as to who should be serving as the Acting Secretary and the Senior Official Performing the Duties of Deputy Secretary to the DHS Office of Inspector General for its review," Thomas H. Armstrong, general counsel for the GAO, wrote.

"We wholeheartedly disagree with the GAO's baseless report and plan to issue a formal response to this shortly," a DHS spokesman told NPR.

Support comes from

The Trump administration has relied heavily on temporary appointments rather than permanently filling key posts. President Trump has said he prefers acting appointments for the speed and flexibility they offer. Because they do not require Senate confirmation, such postings bypass a layer of legislative oversight over the executive branch.

But even for the Trump administration, the lack of permanent leadership at the Department of Homeland Security has been unusual.

"Next Friday is the 500th day that we have not had a Senate-confirmed secretary of Homeland Security," says Steve Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas. "That's a record for a cabinet vacancy."

The last Senate-confirmed secretary, Kirstjen Nielsen, resigned in 2019.

NPR reported last fall that Trump wanted Cuccinelli, an immigration hard-liner, to be secretary, but worried he would not be confirmed by the Senate. So instead he has relied on acting leaders, including Cuccinelli's role as acting deputy.

But the GAO says the acting assignments have been invalid ever since Nielsen's departure. Nielsen tried to change the rules governing temporary appointments to ensure that Trump's preferred choice, Kevin McAleenan, would lead the department after her. But, the GAO found, she bungled the paperwork. (Technically, she amended the annexes to an executive order, instead of amending the executive order itself.)

McAleenan did not have a valid appointment to his role, so when he changed the rules of succession to pave Wolf's path to the acting post, it lacked legitimacy, and when Wolf appointed Cuccinelli it wasn't valid, either.

"The big question is, so what?" asks Anne Joseph O'Connell, a law professor from Stanford.

She notes the GAO's opinion is not binding on DHS or on the court system.

However, under the leadership of Wolf and Cuccinelli, Homeland Security has attracted intense scrutiny for such actions as deploying federal agents to protests in Portland over the opposition of local and state leaders. And new restrictions on asylum seekers and DACA applicants have prompted lawsuits from immigration advocates.

Some of those lawsuits seek to throw out DHS actions on the grounds that DHS leadership is not legitimately in power. And now a government body has endorsed that legal argument, which O'Connell says "could be very persuasive in the courts."

As a result, some of Wolf and Cuccinelli's actions could be undone in court rulings.

The GAO says its review only focused on the legality of the appointments themselves — and not on what this means for actions taken by DHS officials. That matter is being referred to another government watchdog for review.

Copyright 2020 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.

You won’t find a paywall here. Come as often as you like — we’re not counting. You’ve found a like-minded tribe that cherishes what a free press stands for. If you can spend another couple of minutes making a pledge of as little as $5, you’ll feel like a superhero defending democracy for less than the cost of a month of Netflix.