Nevada Public Radio Listen Live

"Fresh Air"
Facebook Twitter Follow Nevada Public Radio

Support Nevada Public Radio
KNPR's State of Nevada About SON Archives Participate Specials

The Cost Of Quitting Coal
The Cost Of Quitting Coal

AIR DATE: April 16, 2013


Dan Jacobsen, Technical Staff Manager, Attorney General's Bureau of Consumer Protection

BY AMY KINGSLEY -- NV Energy wants to close down its coal plants and replace them with natural gas and renewable energy. Sounds pretty straight forward, right?

Dan Jacobsen of the Bureau of Consumer Protection did the math, and realized that NV Energy wants to replace 1,000 Megawatts of coal power with 2,700 Megawatts of natural gas and coal. So in the process of winding down its coal plants, the company will nearly triple its generating capacity -- despite a decline in energy demand, Jacobsen said.

NV Energy makes more profit by building power plants than it does by buying power on the wholesale market, Jacobsen said. So the proposal makes sense for the company’s bottom line.

“If the legislature were to approve it as they’ve proposed it, this would guarantee the company that, in a period of time when there isn’t much growth, they get to build and add more investment to their rate base, which will result in larger profits over about a ten to twelve year period,” Jacobsen said.

But how will it work out for consumers? Although the investment in new energy may pay off in 30 to 40 years, in the next decade or so, customers will pay more for NV Energy’s investment in new sources of cleaner power.

“It’s about a 9 percent price increase, and that’s above inflation,” Jacobsen said.  “A 9 percent price increase is pretty significant on customers, particularly, you know, Nevada has the highest of any Mountain West electricity rates, so adding 9 percent to that is a burden that we think ought to be wrestled with at the Public Utility Commission.”

Jacobsen said the company should keep the proposal to close coal plants, and submit the rest of its plan to the Public Utilities Commission.

“I’m very hopeful that the company will come to the negotiating table and come up with a more reasonable approach —one that just focuses on closing down the coal plants and replacing that capacity and leaving the rest of this to the Public Utilities Commission,” Jacobsen said.


    comments powered by Disqus
    The basic problem with all government-enabled monopolies (including government itself!) is that prices continually go up, quality continually goes down, and the customer is always treated badly. Sound familiar? Welcome to socialist power production!
    Tom HurstApr 9, 2013 12:31:33 PM
    I believe that this has everything to do with the proposed Hydraulic Fracturing in northern Nevada which again your guest on 3/13/2013 on "The Future Of Gas And Oil In Nevada" Lied about Fracking being subject to environmental regulation. It's know as the Halliburton loophole in the 2005 energy act. If Nevada energy plans on switching to natural gas fine, but don't Frack nevada this will poison our water, ruin the rancher and cattle industries,and ruin our tourist industry.
    Christian GerlachApr 9, 2013 09:20:52 AM
    Web hosting facilities provided by Switch.